State v. Sapp
366 A.2d 334, 71 N.J. 476, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 168
Opinion
The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Morgan in her dissenting opinion. 144 N. J. Super. 455 at 460.
Three members of the Court would affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.
For reversal—Chief Justice Hughes, Justices P ashman and Clifford and Judge Oonfoed—4.
For affirmance—Justices Mountain, Sullivan and Sghreiber—3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sapp, 366 A.2d 334, 71 N.J. 476, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 168 (N.J. 1976).
366 A.2d 334 (State v. Sapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Dickerson
177 A.3d 788 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2018)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Jackson
741 A.2d 128 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
State v. Hurdle
709 A.2d 298 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
State v. Zapata
687 A.2d 1025 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
State v. Milton
605 A.2d 757 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
State v. Whyte
628 A.2d 340 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
State ex rel. J.R.
583 A.2d 376 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
State in Interest of JR
583 A.2d 376 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
State v. Palacio
545 A.2d 764 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1988)
State v. Shipp
524 A.2d 864 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
State v. Palacio
500 A.2d 749 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
State v. Brown
404 A.2d 1111 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)