State v. Sapp
This text of 366 A.2d 334 (State v. Sapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Morgan in her dissenting opinion. 144 N. J. Super. 455 at 460.
Three members of the Court would affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.
For reversal—Chief Justice Hughes, Justices P ashman and Clifford and Judge Oonfoed—4.
For affirmance—Justices Mountain, Sullivan and Sghreiber—3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
366 A.2d 334, 71 N.J. 476, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sapp-nj-1976.