State v. Santiago
This text of State v. Santiago (State v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0001078 28-JUN-2013 11:34 AM SCWC-11-0001078
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
ANTHONY SANTIAGO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0001078; CR. NO. 10-1-1319)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on May 16,
2013 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Anthony Santiago is hereby
accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 28, 2013.
Stuart N. Fujioka, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Santiago, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-santiago-haw-2013.