State v. Santiago
713 So. 2d 1127, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524, 1998 WL 422239
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1998·No. No. 96-2818·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We reverse an order dismissing the charges against Appellee on the grounds that section 322.34(l)(a), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional. The issue here is the same as that recently resolved in State v. Keirn, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1144, — So.2d-(Fla. 4th DCA May 6, 1998), in which we concluded that said statute is constitutional.
We remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Keim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Santiago, 713 So. 2d 1127, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524, 1998 WL 422239 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
713 So. 2d 1127 (State v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raulerson v. State
763 So. 2d 285 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Hoskins v. State
713 So. 2d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)