State v. Santiago

713 So. 2d 1127, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524, 1998 WL 422239
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1998
DocketNo. 96-2818
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 713 So. 2d 1127 (State v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Santiago, 713 So. 2d 1127, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524, 1998 WL 422239 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order dismissing the charges against Appellee on the grounds that section 322.34(l)(a), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional. The issue here is the same as that recently resolved in State v. Keirn, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1144, — So.2d-(Fla. 4th DCA May 6, 1998), in which we concluded that said statute is constitutional.

We remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Keim.

STONE, C.J., and KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raulerson v. State
763 So. 2d 285 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Hoskins v. State
713 So. 2d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
713 So. 2d 1127, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524, 1998 WL 422239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-santiago-fladistctapp-1998.