State v. Santiago Agosto
This text of 2025 ND 172 (State v. Santiago Agosto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 172
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Hector Santiago Agosto, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20250135
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia M. Feland, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Isaac O. Lees, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant; on brief. State v. Santiago Agosto No. 20250135
[¶1] Hector Santiago Agosto appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon. Santiago Agosto argues insufficient evidence supports his conviction because evidence does not show he knowingly caused bodily injury. He also argues the evidence does not show his possession of the machete indicated an intent or readiness to inflict serious bodily injury.
[¶2] After review of the record, we conclude sufficient evidence supports Santiago Agosto knowingly caused bodily injury, and possession of a machete and the circumstances surrounding his possession of that machete, indicated an intent or readiness to inflict serious bodily injury. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 ND 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-santiago-agosto-nd-2025.