State v. Santamaria

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Santamaria

577 S.W.3d 508

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 25, 2019

DocketWD 81468

StatusPublished

This text of 577 S.W.3d 508 (State v. Santamaria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Santamaria, 577 S.W.3d 508 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*509Thomas Santamaria appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of murder in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, Santamaria challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, arguing that the State failed to prove deliberation because he was too intoxicated to have coolly reflected on his actions. Finding that there was sufficient evidence of deliberation, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*509Thomas Santamaria appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of murder in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, Santamaria challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, arguing that the State failed to prove deliberation because he was too intoxicated to have coolly reflected on his actions. Finding that there was sufficient evidence of deliberation, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 S.W.3d 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-santamaria-moctapp-2019.