State v. Santamaria

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Santamaria

577 S.W.3d 508

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2019·No. WD 81468·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*509Thomas Santamaria appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of murder in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, Santamaria challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, arguing that the State failed to prove deliberation because he was too intoxicated to have coolly reflected on his actions. Finding that there was sufficient evidence of deliberation, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*509Thomas Santamaria appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of murder in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, Santamaria challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, arguing that the State failed to prove deliberation because he was too intoxicated to have coolly reflected on his actions. Finding that there was sufficient evidence of deliberation, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Santamaria, 577 S.W.3d 508 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

577 S.W.3d 508 (State v. Santamaria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.