State v. Sanseverino

912 A.2d 481, 280 Conn. 945, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 483
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 6, 2006
DocketSC 17787
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 912 A.2d 481 (State v. Sanseverino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sanseverino, 912 A.2d 481, 280 Conn. 945, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 483 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 198 (AC 25793), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*946 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17787. Decided December 6, 2006 Johanna M. Canning, in support of the petition. Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A), kidnapping in the first degree, is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant’s conduct?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sanseverino
949 A.2d 1156 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
912 A.2d 481, 280 Conn. 945, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sanseverino-conn-2006.