State v. Sanseverino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Sanseverino

912 A.2d 481, 280 Conn. 945, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 483

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 6, 2006·No. SC 17787·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 198 (AC 25793), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*946 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17787. Decided December 6, 2006 Johanna M. Canning, in support of the petition. Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A), kidnapping in the first degree, is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant’s conduct?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 198 (AC 25793), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*946 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17787. Decided December 6, 2006 Johanna M. Canning, in support of the petition. Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A), kidnapping in the first degree, is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant’s conduct?”

State v. Sanseverino, 912 A.2d 481, 280 Conn. 945, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 483 (Colo. 2006).

Pincite

912 A.2d 481 (State v. Sanseverino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related