State v. Sanne

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

State v. Sanne

364 A.2d 630, 116 N.H. 583, 1976 N.H. LEXIS 418

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedSeptember 30, 1976

Docket7420

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 364 A.2d 630 (State v. Sanne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sanne, 364 A.2d 630, 116 N.H. 583, 1976 N.H. LEXIS 418 (N.H. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

In this case the defendant appeals his conviction in the superior court on October 31, 1975 (RSA 159:4 (Supp. 1975)) for carrying two loaded pistols without a license to do so. The sole issue he raises before us is whether the statute violates the second amendment to the Federal Constitution.

Transferred by Perkins, J.

The second amendment to the Federal Constitution reads as follows: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” New Hampshire has no constitutional provision granting a right to bear arms. See N.H. Const, pt. I, art. 24. Pertinent provisions of RSA 159:4 (Supp. 1975) provide that “No person shall carry a loaded pistol or revolver... without a license therefor as hereinafter provided.” The relevant provisions of RSA 159:6 (Supp. 1975) state that a nonresident (which the defendant was at the time) may procure a license from the “director of state police, or some person designated by him, upon application... if it appears that the applicant has . .. any proper purpose ....” There follow procedural provisions not involved here.

It is too well established to require elaboration that a State statute reasonably regulating the right to bear arms does not violate the second amendment to the United States Constitution which is not a grant of a right, but “a limitation only upon the power of Congress and the National Government. ...” Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 265 (1886); see United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174, 178 (1939); United States v. Johnson, 497 F.2d 548, 550 (4th Cir. 1974); Commonwealth v. Davis, 343 N.E.2d 847, 850 (Mass. 1976).

Exceptions overruled.

Grimes, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion

In this case the defendant appeals his conviction in the superior court on October 31, 1975 (RSA 159:4 (Supp. 1975)) for carrying two loaded pistols without a license to do so. The sole issue he raises before us is whether the statute violates the second amendment to the Federal Constitution.

Transferred by Perkins, J.

The second amendment to the Federal Constitution reads as follows: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” New Hampshire has no constitutional provision granting a right to bear arms. See N.H. Const, pt. I, art. 24. Pertinent provisions of RSA 159:4 (Supp. 1975) provide that “No person shall carry a loaded pistol or revolver... without a license therefor as hereinafter provided.” The relevant provisions of RSA 159:6 (Supp. 1975) state that a nonresident (which the defendant was at the time) may procure a license from the “director of state police, or some person designated by him, upon application... if it appears that the applicant has . .. any proper purpose ....” There follow procedural provisions not involved here.

It is too well established to require elaboration that a State statute reasonably regulating the right to bear arms does not violate the second amendment to the United States Constitution which is not a grant of a right, but “a limitation only upon the power of Congress and the National Government. ...” Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 265 (1886); see United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174, 178 (1939); United States v. Johnson, 497 F.2d 548, 550 (4th Cir. 1974); Commonwealth v. Davis, 343 N.E.2d 847, 850 (Mass. 1976).

Exceptions overruled.

Grimes, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

364 A.2d 630, 116 N.H. 583, 1976 N.H. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sanne-nh-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack