State v. Sangor
197 A. 5, 119 N.J.L. 429, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 298
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chahcelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sangor, 197 A. 5, 119 N.J.L. 429, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 298 (N.J. 1938).
197 A. 5 (State v. Sangor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Anonymous No. 9 D.B. 87
49 Pa. D. & C.3d 360 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)