State v. Sanford

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sanford

890 S.W.2d 9, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1994 WL 594095

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 1994·No. No. 66026·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals from his conviction of the Class C felony of receiving stolen property pursuant to § 570.080 RSMo 1986. Defendant was found to be a prior and persistent offender under §§ 557.036.4, 558.016.2 and .3, and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals from his conviction of the Class C felony of receiving stolen property pursuant to § 570.080 RSMo 1986. Defendant was found to be a prior and persistent offender under §§ 557.036.4, 558.016.2 and .3, and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Sanford, 890 S.W.2d 9, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1994 WL 594095 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

890 S.W.2d 9 (State v. Sanford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.