State v. Sands

501 A.2d 1303, 1985 Me. LEXIS 879
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedDecember 19, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 501 A.2d 1303 (State v. Sands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sands, 501 A.2d 1303, 1985 Me. LEXIS 879 (Me. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant Randolph Sands appeals from conviction for burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401(2)(B) (1983) and theft, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 353, 362(3)(A) (1983) resulting from a jury-waived trial in the Superior Court (Pe-nobscot County). The sole issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court’s finding that he was a participant in the particular incident of burglary and theft described by the witnesses. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the Superior Court justice could rationally conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant did participate in the particular criminal incident charged. See State v. Durgan, 467 A.2d 165, 166-67 (Me.1983).

The entry is: Judgments affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Durgan
467 A.2d 165 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 A.2d 1303, 1985 Me. LEXIS 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sands-me-1985.