State v. Sandlin
This text of 698 N.E.2d 436 (State v. Sandlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clermont App. No. CA97-10-092. On review of order certifying a conflict, The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ order rendered on June 11,1998, at pages 2-3:
“[Wjhether a conviction for violation of R.C. 4511.19, which ‘shall be considered a previous or subsequent conviction’ pursuant to R.C. 2953.31(A), precludes a defendant from satisfying the statutory definition of a ‘first offender’ contained in R.C. 2953.31(A) even if the conviction sought to be expunged resulted from or was connected with the R.C. 4511.19 violation.”
The conflict case is State v. McGinnis (1993), 90 Ohio App.3d 479, 629 N.E.2d 1084.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
698 N.E.2d 436, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sandlin-ohio-1998.