State v. Sanders

740 N.E.2d 288, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1497, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3126
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 29, 2000
Docket98-1209
StatusPublished

This text of 740 N.E.2d 288 (State v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sanders, 740 N.E.2d 288, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1497, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3126 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-960253. Upon consideration of appellant’s sixth motion to supplement the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement the record be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellant’s counsel file a duplicate of the tape recording of Tunnel Tape 60 for inclusion in the record within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
740 N.E.2d 288, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1497, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sanders-ohio-2000.