State v. Sanders

906 S.W.2d 419, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1603, 1995 WL 565083
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Sanders. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 1995·No. No. 67073·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Columbus Sanders, pleaded guilty to burglary second degree and stealing a firearm. He was sentenced as a prior, persistent, and class X offender under § 558.016, RSMo, (1986), to two concurrent sixteen year terms of imprisonment.

Movant appeals the denial of his “nunc pro tunc motion to set aside judgment for errors of facts.”

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s nunc pro tune motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sanders, 906 S.W.2d 419, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1603, 1995 WL 565083 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

906 S.W.2d 419 (State v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.