State v. Sanchez

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Sanchez

2016 Ohio 8470, 150 Ohio St. 3d 488

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 2016·No. No. 2016-0428·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gonzales, 150 Ohio St.3d 261, 2016-Ohio-8319, 81 N.E.3d 405.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. French, J., concurs in judgment only. O’Donnell, J., dissents. Thomas L. Stierwalt, Sandusky County Prosecuting Attorney, and Norman P. Solze, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Valerie Kunze, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gonzales, 150 Ohio St.3d 261, 2016-Ohio-8319, 81 N.E.3d 405.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. French, J., concurs in judgment only. O’Donnell, J., dissents. Thomas L. Stierwalt, Sandusky County Prosecuting Attorney, and Norman P. Solze, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Valerie Kunze, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

State v. Sanchez, 2016 Ohio 8470, 150 Ohio St. 3d 488 (Ohio 2016).

Pincite

2016 Ohio 8470 (State v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related