State v. Samuels

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Samuels

252 S.W.3d 242, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 655, 2008 WL 2019494

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 13, 2008·No. WD 67864·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Samuels appeals his convictions for two counts of felony murder for his role in aiding the murders of Ernest Wilson and Quentin Chandler. He does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In two points raised under plain error Samuels argues that the prosecutor misstated the law during closing argument and that the applicable MAI-Cr definition of reasonable doubt is unconstitutional. Having reviewed the record, we find no plain error.

As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided for the benefit of the par *243 ties, and the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Samuels appeals his convictions for two counts of felony murder for his role in aiding the murders of Ernest Wilson and Quentin Chandler. He does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In two points raised under plain error Samuels argues that the prosecutor misstated the law during closing argument and that the applicable MAI-Cr definition of reasonable doubt is unconstitutional. Having reviewed the record, we find no plain error.

As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided for the benefit of the par *243 ties, and the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Samuels, 252 S.W.3d 242, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 655, 2008 WL 2019494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

252 S.W.3d 242 (State v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.