Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Samuels

State v. Samuels

823 A.2d 1216, 263 Conn. 923, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 213
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 7, 2003
DocketSC 16994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 823 A.2d 1216 (State v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Samuels, 823 A.2d 1216, 263 Conn. 923, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 213 (Colo. 2003).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 671 (AC 21681), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly admitted the testimony of four constancy of accusation witnesses?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the admission of that evidence deprived the defendant of his federal constitutional due process right to a fair trial?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Samuels
871 A.2d 1005 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 A.2d 1216, 263 Conn. 923, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-samuels-conn-2003.