State v. Samuels

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Samuels

823 A.2d 1216, 263 Conn. 923, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 213

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 7, 2003·No. SC 16994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 671 (AC 21681), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly admitted the testimony of four constancy of accusation witnesses?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the admission of that evidence deprived the defendant of his federal constitutional due process right to a fair trial?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 671 (AC 21681), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly admitted the testimony of four constancy of accusation witnesses?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the admission of that evidence deprived the defendant of his federal constitutional due process right to a fair trial?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

State v. Samuels, 823 A.2d 1216, 263 Conn. 923, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 213 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

823 A.2d 1216 (State v. Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related