State v. Sams
This text of 725 P.2d 410 (State v. Sams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for theft in the first degree, entered after a jury trial. The trial court imposed a sentence of imprisonment for five years. The “sentence order” provided that the sentence be served consecutively to a term of imprisonment which defendant was serving in Oklahoma. The court did not state at the time of sentencing that it was ordering the sentence to be served consecutively or state its reasons for imposing a consecutive sentence. ORS 137.122 and ORS 137.370. The state concedes the error.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
725 P.2d 410, 81 Or. App. 382, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 3398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sams-orctapp-1986.