State v. . Samia

10 S.E.2d 916, 218 N.C. 307, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 148
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 16, 1940·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A witness for the State testified that be bought a pint of whiskey from the defendant. The defendant offered no evidence. The only question was the credibility of the State’s witness. The jury was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of defendant’s guilt and rendered verdict accordingly. In the trial we find

No error.

Motion in Arrest oe Judgment.

In this Court defendant entered a motion in arrest of the judgment on the ground that the ease was transferred from the Craven County recorder’s court to the Superior Court for trial, and that defendant was there tried upon the original warrant without a bill of indictment. This, procedure was authorized by statute, Public Laws 1929, ch. 115, sec. 2, and has been upheld by this Court in S. v. Publishing Co., 179 N. C., 720, 102 S. E., 318; S. v. Saleeby, 183 N. C., 740, 110 S. E., 844. See, also, S. v. Boykin, 211 N. C., 407, 191 S. E., 18.

Motion in arrest of judgment denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Samia, 10 S.E.2d 916, 218 N.C. 307, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 148 (N.C. 1940).

10 S.E.2d 916 (State v. . Samia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sloan
78 S.E.2d 738 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Thomas
73 S.E.2d 283 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
State v. . Shine
22 S.E.2d 447 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
State v. . Turner
17 S.E.2d 501 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)