State v. Sam

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Sam

623 So. 2d 1, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2677, 1993 WL 289288

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 26, 1993

DocketNo. K93-438

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 623 So. 2d 1 (State v. Sam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sam, 623 So. 2d 1, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2677, 1993 WL 289288 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinions

WRIT DENIED: Relator’s conviction was final long before the decision in Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1991), and the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that the Cage decision should not be retroactively applied. See State ex rel. Taylor v. Whitley, 606 So.2d 1292 (La.1992). For this reason, we deny relator’s claim.

The claim made by the relator in his supplemental brief to this court is repetitive to his appeal and will not be considered. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

COOKS, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WRIT DENIED: Relator’s conviction was final long before the decision in Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1991), and the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that the Cage decision should not be retroactively applied. See State ex rel. Taylor v. Whitley, 606 So.2d 1292 (La.1992). For this reason, we deny relator’s claim.

The claim made by the relator in his supplemental brief to this court is repetitive to his appeal and will not be considered. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

COOKS, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 So. 2d 1, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2677, 1993 WL 289288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sam-lactapp-1993.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack