State v. Sam
This text of 64 So. 145 (State v. Sam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants, having been charged with cattle stealing, moved to quash the bill of information, and, after conviction, for a new trial, on the ground that the attorney, who signed the bill, as district at[377]*377torney, had become disqualified for the discharge of the functions of that office by having, after his election thereto, accepted the office of attorney for the village of Grand Ooteau, and acted in that capacity. The motions were overruled, and no bills of exception were reserved; and, as the transcript contains no assignment of error, and there is no error patent upon its face, it presents nothing for this court to act on.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 So. 145, 134 La. 376, 1914 La. LEXIS 1596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sam-la-1914.