State v. Sam

64 So. 145, 134 La. 376, 1914 La. LEXIS 1596
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 5, 1914·No. No. 20,315·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MONROE, J.

Defendants, having been charged with cattle stealing, moved to quash the bill of information, and, after conviction, for a new trial, on the ground that the attorney, who signed the bill, as district at[377] torney, had become disqualified for the discharge of the functions of that office by having, after his election thereto, accepted the office of attorney for the village of Grand Ooteau, and acted in that capacity. The motions were overruled, and no bills of exception were reserved; and, as the transcript contains no assignment of error, and there is no error patent upon its face, it presents nothing for this court to act on.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sam, 64 So. 145, 134 La. 376, 1914 La. LEXIS 1596 (La. 1914).

64 So. 145 (State v. Sam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Peoples
103 So. 38 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
State v. Schrieber
102 So. 678 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
City of New Orleans v. Ricker
69 So. 273 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)