State v. Salmon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Salmon

717 A.2d 233, 244 Conn. 936, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 195

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 7, 1998·No. SC 15930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the surety B & B Bail Bonds Agency, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17752) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the appellant bail bond company, as a nonparty to this criminal action, had no right to appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying its motions for release of bond and for rebate on its bond?”

Carolyn K. Longstreth, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 7, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the surety B & B Bail Bonds Agency, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17752) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the appellant bail bond company, as a nonparty to this criminal action, had no right to appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying its motions for release of bond and for rebate on its bond?”

Carolyn K. Longstreth, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 7, 1998

State v. Salmon, 717 A.2d 233, 244 Conn. 936, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 195 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

717 A.2d 233 (State v. Salmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related