State v. Salley
This text of State v. Salley (State v. Salley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v.
Mike Salley, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212233
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Aiken County The Honorable Ralph F. Cothran, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2014-MO-019 Heard June 11, 2014 – Filed June 18, 2014
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted Mike Salley's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in State v. Salley, Op. No. 2012-UP- 091 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Feb. 22, 2012). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE, JJ., and Acting Justice Dorothy Mobley Jones, concur.
.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Salley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-salley-sc-2014.