State v. Salinas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Salinas

824 P.2d 430, 111 Or. App. 390, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 380

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 12, 1992

Docket90-04-32535; CA A67882

StatusPublished

This text of 824 P.2d 430 (State v. Salinas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Salinas, 824 P.2d 430, 111 Or. App. 390, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 380 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted, after trial to the court, of delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The indictment included an allegation that delivery occurred as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. The state concedes that the sentence was improper and that the case should be remanded for resentencing. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted, after trial to the court, of delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The indictment included an allegation that delivery occurred as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. The state concedes that the sentence was improper and that the case should be remanded for resentencing. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

824 P.2d 430, 111 Or. App. 390, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-salinas-orctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack