State v. Salem
195 S.E.2d 692, 283 N.C. 259, 1973 N.C. LEXIS 954
This text of 195 S.E.2d 692 (State v. Salem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Salem, 195 S.E.2d 692, 283 N.C. 259, 1973 N.C. LEXIS 954 (N.C. 1973).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Richard Dean SALEM and Fred Woodrow Mauney, Jr.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Howard A. Kramer, Associate Atty., for the State.
Lila Bellar, for defendant Salem.
E. George Selvey, Jr., for defendant Mauney.
Petitions for writ of certiorari by defendants to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 17 N.C. App. 269, 193 S.E.2d 755. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Wiggins
235 S.E.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
195 S.E.2d 692, 283 N.C. 259, 1973 N.C. LEXIS 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-salem-nc-1973.