State v. Salazar
This text of 494 N.W.2d 485 (State v. Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Ruben James Salazar for further review of the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals affirming his criminal sexual conduct convictions be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals, which is instructed to engage in the kind of analysis contemplated by Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805, 110 S.Ct. 3139, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), articulating the circumstances surrounding the making of the out-of-court statements demonstrating the particular trustworthiness of the statements. By remanding for this purpose, we express no opinion as to the merits of the issue. Remanded to court of appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
494 N.W.2d 485, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 48, 1993 WL 23865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-salazar-minn-1993.