State v. Sakowicz
125 A. 322, 98 N.J.L. 905, 13 Gummere 905, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 310
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, ICalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sakowicz, 125 A. 322, 98 N.J.L. 905, 13 Gummere 905, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 310 (N.J. 1923).
125 A. 322 (State v. Sakowicz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. State
732 S.W.2d 796 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Blackman v. State
20 S.W.2d 783 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)