State v. Sakowicz
125 A. 322, 98 N.J.L. 905, 13 Gummere 905, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 310
This text of 125 A. 322 (State v. Sakowicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Sakowicz, 125 A. 322, 98 N.J.L. 905, 13 Gummere 905, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 310 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, ICalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
King v. State
732 S.W.2d 796 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Blackman v. State
20 S.W.2d 783 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
125 A. 322, 98 N.J.L. 905, 13 Gummere 905, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sakowicz-nj-1923.