State v. Sailola

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2015·No. SCWC-13-0000002·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000002 30-SEP-2015 01:12 PM

SCWC-13-0000002

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

REED W. SAILOLA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000002; CASE NO. 1DTA-11-03671)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Reed W. Sailola’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August 29, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 30, 2015.

Jonathan E. Burge /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sailola, (haw 2015).

State v. Sailola (State v. Sailola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.