State v. Sage

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Sage

424 P.3d 1210, 191 Wash. 2d 1007

Washington Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 2018·No. No. 95868-8·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 4, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 4, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

State v. Sage, 424 P.3d 1210, 191 Wash. 2d 1007 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

424 P.3d 1210 (State v. Sage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related