State v. SADDORIS

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. SADDORIS

343 S.W.3d 772, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1006, 2011 WL 3273540

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 2, 2011·No. WD 72131·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Davin Saddoris appeals his convictions following a jury trial for first degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, RSMo Cum. Supp.2009, and first degree child molestation, section 566.067, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2009, and sentence of twelve years imprisonment. On appeal, Saddoris contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a bill of particulars and that there was insufficient evidence to support either conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Davin Saddoris appeals his convictions following a jury trial for first degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, RSMo Cum. Supp.2009, and first degree child molestation, section 566.067, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2009, and sentence of twelve years imprisonment. On appeal, Saddoris contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a bill of particulars and that there was insufficient evidence to support either conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. SADDORIS, 343 S.W.3d 772, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1006, 2011 WL 3273540 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

343 S.W.3d 772 (State v. SADDORIS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related