Home/North Dakota Supreme Court/State v. Sabot

State v. Sabot

2017 ND 280, 904 N.W.2d 469
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 7, 2017
Docket20170100
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2017 ND 280 (State v. Sabot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sabot, 2017 ND 280, 904 N.W.2d 469 (N.D. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Eric Sabot appeals from a criminal judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding him guilty of terrorizing. Sabot argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to convict him of terrorizing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding sufficient evidence supports Sabot’s conviction.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sabot v. Pringle
D. North Dakota, 2020
Sabot v. State
2018 ND 251 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 ND 280, 904 N.W.2d 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sabot-nd-2017.