State v. S. U.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. S. U.

501 P.3d 102, 316 Or. App. 826

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 5, 2022

DocketA176433

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 501 P.3d 102 (State v. S. U.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. S. U., 501 P.3d 102, 316 Or. App. 826 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted December 3, 2021, reversed January 5, 2022

In the Matter of S. U., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. U., Appellant. Klamath County Circuit Court 21CC03336; A176433 501 P3d 102

Cameron F. Wogan, Senior Judge. Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Armstrong, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 316 Or App 826 (2022) 827

PER CURIAM Appellant appeals a judgment committing him to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days, as well as an order prohibiting him from purchasing or possessing firearms. He argues that the court failed to com- ply with the citation requirements of ORS 426.080 and ORS 426.090 and this constitutes plain error that entitles him to reversal. The state concedes that this is plain error and that appellant is entitled to reversal. We agree and accept that concession. ORS 426.090 requires a court to issue to an allegedly mentally ill person a citation that informs the per- son of the person’s legal rights, and also requires that “[t]he citation shall be served upon the person by delivering a duly certified copy of the original thereof to the person in person prior to the hearing.” ORS 426.080 provides that the per- son serving such a citation “shall, immediately after service thereof, make a return upon the original warrant or citation showing the time, place and manner of such service and file it with the clerk of the court.” No such citation or certificate of service is in the record in this case. We exercise discre- tion to correct that error for the reasons stated in State v. J. R. W., 307 Or App 372, 475 P3d 138 (2020), and State v. R. E. J., 306 Or App 647, 474 P3d 461 (2020). Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted December 3, 2021, reversed January 5, 2022

In the Matter of S. U., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. U., Appellant. Klamath County Circuit Court 21CC03336; A176433 501 P3d 102

Cameron F. Wogan, Senior Judge. Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Armstrong, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 316 Or App 826 (2022) 827

PER CURIAM Appellant appeals a judgment committing him to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days, as well as an order prohibiting him from purchasing or possessing firearms. He argues that the court failed to com- ply with the citation requirements of ORS 426.080 and ORS 426.090 and this constitutes plain error that entitles him to reversal. The state concedes that this is plain error and that appellant is entitled to reversal. We agree and accept that concession. ORS 426.090 requires a court to issue to an allegedly mentally ill person a citation that informs the per- son of the person’s legal rights, and also requires that “[t]he citation shall be served upon the person by delivering a duly certified copy of the original thereof to the person in person prior to the hearing.” ORS 426.080 provides that the per- son serving such a citation “shall, immediately after service thereof, make a return upon the original warrant or citation showing the time, place and manner of such service and file it with the clerk of the court.” No such citation or certificate of service is in the record in this case. We exercise discre- tion to correct that error for the reasons stated in State v. J. R. W., 307 Or App 372, 475 P3d 138 (2020), and State v. R. E. J., 306 Or App 647, 474 P3d 461 (2020). Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

501 P.3d 102, 316 Or. App. 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-u-orctapp-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack