State v. S. & S.

522 P.2d 497, 17 Or. App. 539, 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 1116
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 28, 1974
DocketNo. 79862
StatusPublished

This text of 522 P.2d 497 (State v. S. & S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. S. & S., 522 P.2d 497, 17 Or. App. 539, 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 1116 (Or. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The stipulated facts show that the emancipated minor child of the defendants was intermittently confined at the Oregon State Hospital and incurred expenses which his parents refused to pay, although they were, at all times, financially able to pay.

A petition by the plaintiff for reimbursement was denied by the trial court on the ground that Oregon Laws 1971, ch 750, § 3, which provided that parents of emancipated minors were not liable for expenses incurred at state institutions, was retroactive, removing any liability the parents incurred prior to the effective date of the Act. Both parties agree that the parents are not liable for any expenses arising after the effective date of ch 750.

In the absence of an indication by the legislature to the contrary, legislative acts will not be construed in a manner which changes legal rights and responsibilities arising out of transactions which occur prior to the effective date of such acts. Joseph v. Lowery, 261 Or 545, 551-52, 495 P2d 273 (1972). There was no such legislative indication in this case. The financial responsibilities of the parents arising prior to the effective date of ch 750 survive its passage.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph v. Lowery
495 P.2d 273 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 P.2d 497, 17 Or. App. 539, 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-s-orctapp-1974.