State v. S. M. T.
195 P.3d 470, 223 Or. App. 248, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1456
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 15, 2008·No. 050766701; A129432·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s order of civil commitment, arguing that the evidence was not clear and convincing that, because of her mental disorder, she is a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes the error. On de novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005), we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient to support an order of civil commitment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. S. M. T., 195 P.3d 470, 223 Or. App. 248, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1456 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
195 P.3d 470 (State v. S. M. T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Smt
195 P.3d 470 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)