State v. S. M. T.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. S. M. T.

195 P.3d 470, 223 Or. App. 248, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1456

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 15, 2008

Docket050766701; A129432

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 P.3d 470 (State v. S. M. T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. S. M. T., 195 P.3d 470, 223 Or. App. 248, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1456 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s order of civil commitment, arguing that the evidence was not clear and convincing that, because of her mental disorder, she is a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes the error. On de novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005), we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient to support an order of civil commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s order of civil commitment, arguing that the evidence was not clear and convincing that, because of her mental disorder, she is a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes the error. On de novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005), we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient to support an order of civil commitment.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 P.3d 470, 223 Or. App. 248, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-m-t-orctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack