State v. S. M. P. (In re S. M. P.)

447 P.3d 84, 299 Or. App. 202
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 28, 2019·No. A169211·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*85*203Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends the judgment should be reversed because the court failed to serve a citation on appellant "prior to the hearing," as required by ORS 426.090.1 Appellant acknowledges that he did not preserve his assignment of error, but requests that we review and correct the error as plain error. ORAP 5.45(1). We reject appellant's assignment of error because any error by the court was not "plain."

Here, the transcript of the proceedings shows that appellant was served with the citation at 10:03 a.m. prior to the commencement of the hearing. However, the court file provides that the hearing was set for 10:30 a.m., and the filed certificate of service provides that appellant was served with the citation on the date of the hearing at 10:37 a.m. Because it is not irrefutable, based on this record, that appellant was not served with the citation until after the hearing commenced, the error alleged by appellant does not qualify as plain error. See State v. Jury , 185 Or. App. 132, 135, 57 P.3d 970 (2002), rev. den. , 335 Or. 504, 72 P.3d 636 (2003) ("For error to be considered apparent on the face of the record for purposes of ORAP 5.45, it must satisfy three criteria: (1) it must be legal error; (2) it must be apparent, such that the legal point is obvious, not reasonably in dispute; and (3) it must appear on the face of the record, such that we need not go outside the record or choose between competing inferences to find it, and the facts that comprise the error are *204irrefutable." (Internal quotation marks omitted.)). Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. S. M. P. (In re S. M. P.), 447 P.3d 84, 299 Or. App. 202 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

447 P.3d 84 (State v. S. M. P. (In re S. M. P.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. K. R. B.
464 P.3d 171 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)