State v. S. M. P. (In re S. M. P.)
This text of 447 P.3d 84 (State v. S. M. P. (In re S. M. P.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*85*203Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends the judgment should be reversed because the court failed to serve a citation on appellant "prior to the hearing," as required by ORS 426.090.1 Appellant acknowledges that he did not preserve his assignment of error, but requests that we review and correct the error as plain error. ORAP 5.45(1). We reject appellant's assignment of error because any error by the court was not "plain."
Here, the transcript of the proceedings shows that appellant was served with the citation at 10:03 a.m. prior to the commencement of the hearing. However, the court file provides that the hearing was set for 10:30 a.m., and the filed certificate of service provides that appellant was served with the citation on the date of the hearing at 10:37 a.m. Because it is not irrefutable, based on this record, that appellant was not served with the citation until after the hearing commenced, the error alleged by appellant does not qualify as plain error. See State v. Jury ,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 P.3d 84, 299 Or. App. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-m-p-in-re-s-m-p-orctapp-2019.