State v. S. M. (In re S. M.)
This text of 426 P.3d 683 (State v. S. M. (In re S. M.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*684*294Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his third assignment of error, appellant contends that the record lacked sufficient evidence that, due to a mental disorder, he was unable to provide for his basic needs.1 The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant was unable to meet his basic needs and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
426 P.3d 683, 294 Or. App. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-m-in-re-s-m-orctapp-2018.