State v. S. L.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. S. L.

328 P.3d 822, 263 Or. App. 560

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 11, 2014

Docket13MH0027; A155081

StatusPublished

This text of 328 P.3d 822 (State v. S. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. S. L., 328 P.3d 822, 263 Or. App. 560 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 P.3d 822, 263 Or. App. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-l-orctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack