State v. S. L. L.

206 P.3d 1210, 228 Or. App. 227, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 313
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 29, 2009·No. 080868706; A139907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The trial court entered a judgment finding that appellant suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to provide for her basic needs and ordered her committed. On appeal, appellant contends that there is insufficient evidence that she was unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. S. L. L., 206 P.3d 1210, 228 Or. App. 227, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 313 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

206 P.3d 1210 (State v. S. L. L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Sll
206 P.3d 1210 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)