State v. S. L. L.
This text of 206 P.3d 1210 (State v. S. L. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court entered a judgment finding that appellant suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to provide for her basic needs and ordered her committed. On appeal, appellant contends that there is insufficient evidence that she was unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 P.3d 1210, 228 Or. App. 227, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-l-l-orctapp-2009.