State v. S. L. L.

206 P.3d 1210, 228 Or. App. 227, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 313
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 29, 2009
Docket080868706; A139907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 P.3d 1210 (State v. S. L. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. S. L. L., 206 P.3d 1210, 228 Or. App. 227, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 313 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The trial court entered a judgment finding that appellant suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to provide for her basic needs and ordered her committed. On appeal, appellant contends that there is insufficient evidence that she was unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Sll
206 P.3d 1210 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 P.3d 1210, 228 Or. App. 227, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-l-l-orctapp-2009.