State v. S. C. D.
This text of 193 P.3d 1055 (State v. S. C. D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 P.3d 1055, 222 Or. App. 523, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-c-d-orctapp-2008.