State v. S. A. H.

243 P.3d 1218, 239 Or. App. 360, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1596
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 8, 2010
DocketM100044; A145500
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 P.3d 1218 (State v. S. A. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. S. A. H., 243 P.3d 1218, 239 Or. App. 360, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1596 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court determined that appellant is “unable to provide for basic needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for health or safety.” On appeal, we review the record to determine whether there is legally sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the evidence in the record is legally insufficient to support the court’s determination. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Sah
243 P.3d 1218 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 P.3d 1218, 239 Or. App. 360, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-a-h-orctapp-2010.