State v. S. A. H.

243 P.3d 1218, 239 Or. App. 360, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1596
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 8, 2010·No. M100044; A145500·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court determined that appellant is “unable to provide for basic needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for health or safety.” On appeal, we review the record to determine whether there is legally sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the evidence in the record is legally insufficient to support the court’s determination. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. S. A. H., 243 P.3d 1218, 239 Or. App. 360, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1596 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

243 P.3d 1218 (State v. S. A. H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Sah
243 P.3d 1218 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)