State v. Ryland

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Ryland

840 P.2d 197, 120 Wash. 2d 325, 1992 Wash. LEXIS 277

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 25, 1992

Docket59466-0

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 840 P.2d 197 (State v. Ryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ryland, 840 P.2d 197, 120 Wash. 2d 325, 1992 Wash. LEXIS 277 (Wash. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A Department of this court unanimously adopts the reasoning of the dissent in State v. Ryland, 65 Wn. App. 806, 810, 829 P.2d 806 (1992) (Agid, J., dissenting). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the police officer reasonably believed the houseguest had authority to consent to entry. The case is thereafter remanded to the Court of Appeals, Division One, for resolution.

Reconsideration denied December 30, 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A Department of this court unanimously adopts the reasoning of the dissent in State v. Ryland, 65 Wn. App. 806, 810, 829 P.2d 806 (1992) (Agid, J., dissenting). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the police officer reasonably believed the houseguest had authority to consent to entry. The case is thereafter remanded to the Court of Appeals, Division One, for resolution.

Reconsideration denied December 30, 1992.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 P.2d 197, 120 Wash. 2d 325, 1992 Wash. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ryland-wash-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack