State v. Ryland

840 P.2d 197, 120 Wash. 2d 325, 1992 Wash. LEXIS 277
Washington Supreme Court·Decided November 25, 1992·No. 59466-0·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A Department of this court unanimously adopts the reasoning of the dissent in State v. Ryland, 65 Wn. App. 806, 810, 829 P.2d 806 (1992) (Agid, J., dissenting). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the police officer reasonably believed the houseguest had authority to consent to entry. The case is thereafter remanded to the Court of Appeals, Division One, for resolution.

Reconsideration denied December 30, 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ryland, 840 P.2d 197, 120 Wash. 2d 325, 1992 Wash. LEXIS 277 (Wash. 1992).

840 P.2d 197 (State v. Ryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Holmes
108 Wash. App. 511 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2001)
State v. Ryland
829 P.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1992)