State v. Ryan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ryan

60 Mo. App. 487, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 321

DecidedJanuary 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Mo. App. 487 (State v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ryan, 60 Mo. App. 487, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 321 (Mo. Ct. App. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

.Biggs, J.

The defendant was indicted under section 3746 of the Revised Statutes of 1889, for, knowingly casting more than one ballot at an election for municipal officers of the city of St. Louis. The evidence was not sufficient to convict him of. the felony charged, but it tended only to prove an attempt to cast more than one vote at said election, which,' under section 3746, is made a misdemeanor. The court instructed the jury that they must acquit the defendant of the offense chhrged in the indictment, but the other instructions authorized a conviction under section 3747, supra. There was a conviction, and a fine of $100 was assessed. The defendant has appealed. .

There are no briefs filed on either side, but the law requires us to examine the record to see that the defendant has had a fair trial.

There is no trouble about the indictment. It follows the language of the statute, and fully apprised the defendant of the offense with which he was charged.

[488]*488There was substantial evidence tending to prove that the defendant attempted to cast an illegal ballot at the election mentioned in the indictment. Under section 3950 of the statute he was properly convicted of that offense. Where an accused is charged in the indictment with the greater offense, he may be convicted- of. the lesser if the commission of the latter is necessarily included in the commission of the former.

With the concurrence of the other judges, the judgment of the Criminal Court will be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

.Biggs, J.

The defendant was indicted under section 3746 of the Revised Statutes of 1889, for, knowingly casting more than one ballot at an election for municipal officers of the city of St. Louis. The evidence was not sufficient to convict him of. the felony charged, but it tended only to prove an attempt to cast more than one vote at said election, which,' under section 3746, is made a misdemeanor. The court instructed the jury that they must acquit the defendant of the offense chhrged in the indictment, but the other instructions authorized a conviction under section 3747, supra. There was a conviction, and a fine of $100 was assessed. The defendant has appealed. .

There are no briefs filed on either side, but the law requires us to examine the record to see that the defendant has had a fair trial.

There is no trouble about the indictment. It follows the language of the statute, and fully apprised the defendant of the offense with which he was charged.

[488]*488There was substantial evidence tending to prove that the defendant attempted to cast an illegal ballot at the election mentioned in the indictment. Under section 3950 of the statute he was properly convicted of that offense. Where an accused is charged in the indictment with the greater offense, he may be convicted- of. the lesser if the commission of the latter is necessarily included in the commission of the former.

With the concurrence of the other judges, the judgment of the Criminal Court will be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Mo. App. 487, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ryan-moctapp-1895.