State v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Ryan

619 So. 2d 537, 1993 La. LEXIS 1886, 1993 WL 190594

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 4, 1993

DocketNo. 93-KK-1241

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 619 So. 2d 537 (State v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ryan, 619 So. 2d 537, 1993 La. LEXIS 1886, 1993 WL 190594 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 353-189; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

Granted. The district court’s judgment granting the defendant’s motion to quash is vacated and this case is remanded for further proceedings. Determination of whether the defendant will receive good time credit on the time he spent in jail after arrest and before sentencing to a term of imprisonment at hard labor rests exclusively with the Department of Corrections. La.R.S. 15:571.3. The defendant therefore had not yet completed his sentence on the same day that it was imposed with credit for time served when the state filed its multiple bill. Under these circumstances, the state filed the multiple bill within a reasonable time of the defendant’s conviction and sentence and before the defendant had secured his release from custody on the penalty imposed for the predicate offense. See State v. George, 218 La. 18, 48 So.2d 265 (1950); cf, State v. Broussard, 416 So.2d 109 (La.1982); State v. Bell, 324 So.2d 451 (La.1975); State v. McQueen, 308 So.2d 752 (La.1975).

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 353-189; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

Granted. The district court’s judgment granting the defendant’s motion to quash is vacated and this case is remanded for further proceedings. Determination of whether the defendant will receive good time credit on the time he spent in jail after arrest and before sentencing to a term of imprisonment at hard labor rests exclusively with the Department of Corrections. La.R.S. 15:571.3. The defendant therefore had not yet completed his sentence on the same day that it was imposed with credit for time served when the state filed its multiple bill. Under these circumstances, the state filed the multiple bill within a reasonable time of the defendant’s conviction and sentence and before the defendant had secured his release from custody on the penalty imposed for the predicate offense. See State v. George, 218 La. 18, 48 So.2d 265 (1950); cf, State v. Broussard, 416 So.2d 109 (La.1982); State v. Bell, 324 So.2d 451 (La.1975); State v. McQueen, 308 So.2d 752 (La.1975).

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 So. 2d 537, 1993 La. LEXIS 1886, 1993 WL 190594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ryan-la-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack