State v. Ruud
Opinion
Filed 5/11/06 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2006 ND 92
Gregory Clifford Kaiser, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20050319
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Dennis D. Fisher (on brief), 3431 4th Ave. S., Ste. 200, P.O. Box 9706, Fargo, ND 58107-9706, for petitioner and appellant.
Birch P. Burdick (argued), State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.
Kaiser v. State
[¶1] Gregory Kaiser appeals from a judgment denying his application for post-
conviction relief. Kaiser claimed he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel, his confession was coerced, the State failed to disclose exculpatory evidence, and his guilty plea was not voluntary. The district court found Kaiser did not establish a basis for post-conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2006 ND 94 (State v. Ruud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.