State v. Rutherford

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Rutherford

909 N.W.2d 112

North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided April 10, 2018·No. No. 20170370·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*113[¶ 1] Robert William Rutherford appeals from a criminal judgment ordering restitution after Rutherford pled guilty to conspiracy to commit criminal mischief. Rutherford argues the district court abused its discretion by determining he had the ability to pay the restitution ordered. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

*113[¶ 1] Robert William Rutherford appeals from a criminal judgment ordering restitution after Rutherford pled guilty to conspiracy to commit criminal mischief. Rutherford argues the district court abused its discretion by determining he had the ability to pay the restitution ordered. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen

State v. Rutherford, 909 N.W.2d 112 (N.D. 2018).

Pincite

909 N.W.2d 112 (State v. Rutherford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.