State v. Rutherford
This text of 909 N.W.2d 112 (State v. Rutherford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*113[¶ 1] Robert William Rutherford appeals from a criminal judgment ordering restitution after Rutherford pled guilty to conspiracy to commit criminal mischief. Rutherford argues the district court abused its discretion by determining he had the ability to pay the restitution ordered. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
909 N.W.2d 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rutherford-nd-2018.