State v. Rutherford
This text of 2006 ND 129 (State v. Rutherford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/29/06 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2006 ND 129
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Robert Rutherford, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20050374
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Brandi Sasse Russell, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Wayne D. Goter, 723 Memorial Highway, P.O. Box 1552, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1552, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Rutherford
[¶1] Robert Rutherford appeals from his criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary and assault. He argues the State did not present sufficient evidence to convict him of burglary and assault. Concluding there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2006 ND 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rutherford-nd-2006.