State v. Rust

8 Blackf. 195, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 115
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 24, 1846·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

WHERE the time for the prosecution of an offence is limited by statute, the time, as averred in the indictment, should appear to be within the limit. 1 Chitt. C. L. 223.— The State v. G. S., 1 Tyler’s R. 295.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rust, 8 Blackf. 195, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 115 (Ind. 1846).

8 Blackf. 195 (State v. Rust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
168 N.E.2d 199 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1960)
State v. Sammons
95 Ind. 22 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Vaughn v. Congdon
56 Vt. 111 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1883)
State v. Hobbs
39 Me. 212 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1855)