State v. Russo
This text of 400 A.2d 383 (State v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of three counts of kidnapping with a firearm, 17—A M.R.S.A. § 301 (Supp.1978), and one count of aggravated assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (Supp.1978), after a jury trial in the Superi- or Court, York County. We decline to consider defendant’s contention, asserted for the first time on appeal, that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the State’s motion for joinder of defendants under Rule 13, M.R.Crim.P. State v. Saucier, Me., 385 A.2d 44 (1978). The evidence was plainly sufficient to support the convictions.
The entry is:
Appeal denied.
Judgment affirmed.
DUFRESNE, A. R. J., sat by assignment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
400 A.2d 383, 1979 Me. LEXIS 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-russo-me-1979.