State v. Russell
198 P. 393, 115 Wash. 693, 1921 Wash. LEXIS 793
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court denying the state the right to recover a contribution from the respondent to the accident fund provided for in the workmen’s compensation act.
The case is controlled by our decision in the case of State v. Eyres Storage & Dist. Co., ante p. 682, 198 Pac. 390, and is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Russell, 198 P. 393, 115 Wash. 693, 1921 Wash. LEXIS 793 (Wash. 1921).
198 P. 393 (State v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raymond v. Ingram
737 P.2d 314 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1987)
State v. Bell
508 P.2d 1398 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1973)
Edmisten v. Dousette
334 S.W.2d 746 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1960)
Anna Bowman and Doris Bowman v. The Home Life Insurance Company of America, a Delaware Corporation
243 F.2d 331 (Third Circuit, 1957)
LaFramboise v. Schmidt
254 P.2d 485 (Washington Supreme Court, 1953)
Sova v. First Nat. Bk. of Ferndale
138 P.2d 181 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
Beausoliel v. United States
107 F.2d 292 (D.C. Circuit, 1939)
Larson v. Union Investment & Loan Co.
10 P.2d 557 (Washington Supreme Court, 1932)
Robinson v. Silver Lake Railway & Lumber Co.
299 P. 356 (Washington Supreme Court, 1931)