State v. Russell
This text of 2017 ND 62 (State v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 3/30/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2017 ND 62
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Charles William Russell, II, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20160310
Appeal from the District Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Robin A. Schmidt, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Stephenie L. Davis, McKenzie County Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 Fifth Street Northwest, Suite 550, Watford City, N.D. 58854, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Scott O. Diamond, 3523 45th Street South, Suite 100, Fargo, N.D. 58104, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Russell
[¶1] Charles Russell appeals from criminal judgments entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Russell argues his convictions should be reversed because the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdicts. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-russell-nd-2017.