State v. Russell
211 S.E.2d 512, 24 N.C. App. 585, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2443
Opinion
Although defendants have assigned no error, the appeal of each defendant constitutes an exception to the judgment imposed on him and presents the case for review for error appearing on the face of the record. State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330 (1967). We have reviewed the record proper and find [586] it to be free from prejudicial error. The verdicts and judgments will not be disturbed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Russell, 211 S.E.2d 512, 24 N.C. App. 585, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2443 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).
211 S.E.2d 512 (State v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Elliott
153 S.E.2d 330 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)